Lauren Hanley-Brady

Lauren Hanley-Brady lastly worked with by the founder of the McMillan Academy of Legislation that is headed by Scott McMillan San Diego Lawyer, with The_McMillan_Law_Firm La Mesa, 4670 Nebo Drive, that was sued for fraud, see the claim here. Although the lawsuit against Michelle Volk San Diego Lawyer, as well as Scott McMillan was asked to be reject, the court rejected it.

Just a couple of months ago in 2017, a 9th Circuit judge mockingly called a lawsuit submitted by Scott McMillan La Mesa Lawyer, a “Silly” claim that did not have benefit concept. The video clip of the courts comments can be located in this video, So regrettable to have the U.S.A. safeguard volumes of documents submitted by The McMillan Law Firm La Mesa, just for the court to call the case “silly.”.

Losing judicial sources is worrying for me because courts have limited time to manage meritorious situations. Individuals who lose judicial resources are known as a vexatious plaintiff. In yet an additional case entailing Scott McMillan, La Mesa, McMillan v. Weathersby (9th Cir. 2002) 31 F.App’ x 371, 374, complained about among his lots of losses. The Court disposed of the disagreement of Scott McMillan and found that, “None of the three main episodes that McMillan offers sustains granting a mistrial. McMillan initially asserts that defense attorney broke the court’s in limine ruling barring referral to McMillan as a “vexatious plaintiff” by describing McMillan’s various other lawsuits in his opening up declaration.” McMillan LOST that case.

Just recently a federal court fixed the belief of Scott McMillan as well as ordered an additional among his appeals to be disregarded. In Lycurgan, Inc. v. Todd JonesFiled (ATF Chief), Ninth Cir., Case No. 15-55228, SDCA Case No. 3:14- cv-01424, where it claimed, “Appropriately, we disregard this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. DISREGARDED.”.

In spite of the DOZENS of losses Scott McMillan has the audacity to fraudulently represent himself as a leading lawyer in San Diego. Essentially he states he “IS” a leading attorney in the connected screenshot. I am unable to locate a SOLITARY publication where Scott McMillan has received awards from Customer Attorneys of San Diego, Lexis Magazine, San Diego Daily Transcript, Los Angeles Attorney, or ranking Scott McMillan or his flunky company as leading in any kind of group– unless he’s rated in sheds, then Scott McMillan “IS” a leading lawyer because group. Merely ask any of the attorneys who have actually defended instance brought by Scott McMillan about the fruitlessness of the cases he has filed:.

Julian John Pardini & Jonathan David Martin (defeated McMillan on wrongful death case)

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith

333 Bush Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, CA 94104

Timothy J. Daley

Musick Peeler

225 Broadway

Suite 1900

San Diego, CA 92101

William V. Whelan

Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP

401 B Street, Suite 1200

San Diego, California 92101

Douglas M. Butz

Higgs Fletcher & Mack

401 W A St #2600

San Diego, CA 92101

James R. McMullen, Jr. & Frederic Gordon (defeated McMillan on multiple cases, and appeals/writs)


101 W Broadway Suite 2000

San Diego, Ca 92101

Daniel Dart Bodell

Harrison & Bodell, LLP

11455 El Camino Real, Suite 480

San Diego, CA 92130

Elizabeth P Trent (switched firms, but partner in charge of case is forthcoming with information about Scott McMillan to other defense counsel – obtained $16,000 discovery sanctions against McMillan)

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

555 S Flower St 45th Fl

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Spencer C. Skeen

Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC

4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 990

San Diego, CA 92122

Elaine B. Alston

Copenbarger & Associates

780 Roosevelt

Irvine, CA 92620

Paul D. Copenbarger

Copenbarger & Associates

780 Roosevelt

Irvine, CA 92620

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on, it is strongly advised to avoid Lauren Hanley-Brady in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Lauren Hanley-Brady. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Lauren Hanley-Brady is rated 1 out of 5 based on the complaints submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased complaints.
The above complaints and comments against Lauren Hanley-Brady were submitted by user(s) and have been published as-is. does not edit, alter or remove content published by it’s users. There’s no amount of money a business can pay to manipulate their complaints and will NOT entertain any request to remove the complaint on Lauren Hanley-Brady at any cost whatsoever.