VINCENTE JIMENEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

       DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                         VINCENTE JIMENEZ,
                              Appellant,

                                     v.

                         STATE OF FLORIDA,
                              Appellee.

                               No. 4D19-1343

                           [October 14, 2020]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.
Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF003175A.

  Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

   Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   The defendant raises four issues on appeal, only one of which has
merit. We affirm his conviction for aggravated battery and his sentence,
but we agree that his judgment improperly includes the words “PRIOR
CONVICTION” in the description of the crime and improperly references
section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, we remand for the trial
court to correct the judgment by removing these references. The defendant
need not be present for the entry of the corrected judgment.

   We affirm with respect to the remaining issues.

   Remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

                           *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on YScam.com, it is strongly advised to avoid VINCENTE JIMENEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from VINCENTE JIMENEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike YScam.com, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
VINCENTE JIMENEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA is rated 1 out of 5 based on the complaints submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased complaints.
The above complaints and comments against VINCENTE JIMENEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA were submitted by YScam.com user(s) and have been published as-is. YScam.com does not edit, alter or remove content published by it’s users. There’s no amount of money a business can pay to manipulate their complaints and YScam.com will NOT entertain any request to remove the complaint on VINCENTE JIMENEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA at any cost whatsoever.
>